Jesus was twelve years old
(Luke 2:42). He should have known by that age that he was supposed to be
respectful of his parents. He should have known better than to just stay behind
in Jerusalem while his family hit the road to return to Nazareth. He put a huge
imposition upon his mother and father, making them return in search of him. The
young boy Jesus adopted the practice that many of us engage in. It’s easier to
ask forgiveness than it is to ask permission. If a half lie is really a full
lie, then perhaps masked disobedience may be full disobedience. Did Jesus sin?
When his parents found him
his mother said to him, “Son, why have you treated us like this? Your father
and I have been anxiously searching for you” (Luke 2:48). Jesus gave them an
answer, an excuse for his disrespectful behavior, saying that he had to stay
behind in the temple, in his Father’s house. Again I ask, did Jesus sin?
But you say that Jesus had to
be sinless to be the sacrifice for our sins. Maybe this disrespectful behavior,
if it was a sin, was forgiven. Like a sacrificial lamb in the temple worship,
the small blemish was surgically removed and the Lamb of God was pronounced
perfect.
You don’t buy that? Neither do I. Jesus was the perfect Son of
God (Hebrews 5).
The point of the argument is
this. If we were to judge Jesus’ behavior on the basis of right and wrong,
black and white, legalistic and moralistic obedience, we should probably say
that Jesus sinned. But we know that his faith-relationship with His heavenly
father, even at the age of twelve, moved him to do what he did. And we justify
it based on standards of trust and surrender that we are reluctant to apply to
others. For Jesus we can freely grant grace, but for the many who believed God
and walked in faith (Hebrews 11) we hold them to moralistic standards of law
and obedience.
I recently heard a sermon
about the belt of truth, which the speaker mysteriously made into the belt of
truthfulness. Our own obedience, he suggested, not an armor supplied by God, is
our defense against the fiery darts of Satan. As an example he made Abraham out
to be the Father of Lies, not the Father of Faith that the Scriptures declare.
Oh how my heart was grieved.
The law demanded obedience, a
standard that was impossible to attain. God’s glory still shone through that
old covenant of impossible demands. But how much greater is the glory of the covenant
of grace (II Cor 3:8-11). How much
greater is the glory of living in the righteousness of Christ, than in our own
self-effort. How much greater is the
glory of living in surrender to the love of God than in pretense and self-righteous
obedience.
When obedience is the measure
of faith then men pretend and they hide. They glory in their self-righteousness
while looking down on others who don’t measure up. They fail and then live in guilt
and shame. They give up. Or worst of all, they want nothing to do with the
moralistic demands of a religion that they cannot live up to. As one young man
said to me recently, “I have decided that I do not want to be a Christian. The
expectations are too much, and I know I would fail. And then everyone would say
to me that you said you were a Christian, but look what you did.”
It is the goal of my
Christian walk to ever increase in my knowledge of living in relation with God
by faith – that is by trusting grace rather than observing the law, by living
in surrender rather than mere obedience, being empowered by the Holy Spirit
rather than self-effort, being motivated by the incredible love of God and the
far-reaching forgiveness that is the heart and soul of His grace. His truth
gives me direction as I surrender to His great love. But if we put obedience as
the measure of faith, we can call Abraham the Father of lies, and we might even
have to conclude that Jesus sinned when he was disrespectful to his parents.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for sharing a comment. Please make it encouraging, enlightening, and helpful. Bless others as God blesses his own.