In this passage Paul wrote about the day of the Lord, the second coming of Jesus, when believers will be gathered to Him. The Thessalonian church must have been deceived by a false teaching that the Day of the Lord had already come and gone, passing them by. But Paul assures them that the return of Christ had not yet occurred, and that it would not happen until after the man of lawlessness is revealed, and after the great rebellion has occurred.
Paul’s writing to clear up the misunderstanding ends up being a very valuable discourse about the man of lawlessness. He wrote that the man of lawlessness “will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.” Paul also wrote that the revelation of the man of lawlessness will be restrained until the proper time. In the end, he will be overthrown and destroyed by the Lord Himself.
The professor quickly deduced that the man of lawlessness was the Antichrist. And I would agree with that, even to this day. But not the Antichrist that most Christians imagine. No mention was made to the fact that the term antichrist does not appear in all of Paul’s writings, nor anywhere in all of Revelation. It was presumed that the man of lawlessness was the same person being prophesied by the imagery of the Beast in Revelation 13. But that is not accurate. The beast in Revelation 13 is a prophecy of a nation, not a man, not the Antichrist. That leaves this passage written by Paul (2 Thes. 2) as the most significant description of the antichrist. He is not bigger than life, like many have been taught to believe. He is not a supernatural imitation of Christ, who can do incredible miracles, even rising from the dead. He’s not even a world leader, just an Arab-Islamic leader.
The rebellion at the end of the age, prior to the second coming of Jesus, was determined to be a great apostasy, linked to the statement of Jesus, “many will fall away.” But in reality, it is a godless and wicked rebellion, led by the man of lawlessness, the Islamic Mahdi. That “rebellion” aligns clearly with the ten-nation alliance that is revealed in Revelation 17. The man of lawlessness will lead a vast army against Israel and Jerusalem in a jihadi attempt to destroy and annihilate the Jews (Ezek. 38:14-23; Rev 9:13-16).
Furthermore, the class concluded that the man of lawlessness would set himself up in the temple in Jerusalem, in the middle of the Great Tribulation. That did not come from studying the Greek, I guarantee you. The temple is not ieron in the Greek, meaning the brick-and-mortar temple in Jerusalem, but it is naos in the Greek, meaning the holy dwelling place of God. The man of lawlessness will declare himself to be God, usurping the place of the one true God in his holy, heavenly temple.
The
restrainer that holds back that great rebellion until the appointed time was suggested,
in that class, to be either the Holy Spirit or the Church itself. The Church,
and possibly the Holy Spirit as well, would be removed at the pre-tribulation
rapture, thereby releasing the power and wickedness of the Antichrist. But that
is more theological baggage that needs to be jettisoned, part of the whole
tribulation hoax. The restraint is clearly identified in the visions of
Revelation, in the sixth trumpet warning and the sixth bowl judgment. The
angels who hold back the enormous army at the Euphrates River will be released,
and the enemy of Israel will be led into the Valley of Decision, the battle of
Armageddon (Rev 9:14-16; 16:12-14).
Yes indeed, that Greek class proved to be quite momentous for me. I am so glad, so thankful, that the Holy Spirit stirred my heart to keep re-examining prophecy.